We are currently, we see companies withdraw from ESG. Some of them reflect today’s evolving political landscape, but there is a deeper issue in the game: for many, the efforts of sustainability are still far from daily truths.
First of all, people improve their daily lives. Priority “Development” on “Development” is a common progress in the direction of “Development” fuel inequality and UN sustainable developmental purposes (SDG).
I remember my school classes inside school trees after the Typhoons classroom grow in the Philippines. Years later, those storms are intensified, communities that look at them are still the most vulnerable. In low and medium-income countries, it is a fundamental infrastructure for developing climate sustainability and sustainable infrastructure.
Sustainability is to remove poverty, improving health and livelihoods – they are recent purposes. If safety, live salary and social mobility, it is losing its purpose, if it is separated from human consequences.
Ungoing “Development” in UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) is a fuel for inequality Global Risk Report of the World Economic Forum. Back to UN SDG conversations We must bring “development”.
Companies have a lot of influence on whether SDGs are successful or failed. In recent years, the work of the work in SDG progress is improving, we must pay attention to people. We are bombarded with sustainability data from companies. However, despite the richness of the data, there is still a space because they assess the progress of companies, because they often think the effects of people.
The World Evaluation Union (WBA) has been updated earlier this year SDG2000 – List of the world’s 2000 most prestigious company. Collectively, 2000 companies use more than 99 million people and more than hundreds of millions of human supply chains. Companies serve daily billions of consumers, and 46% of global GDP equivalents have $ 48 trillion income. Despite the great traces of the world, they are not enough to allow sustainable development.
For example, real estate, construction, transport, energy, waste and water management sectors, among WBA companies among the WBA companies City Benchmark found many companies operating in high-risk urban areas poorly made for natural disasters. More than 60% do not disclose the correct risk assessments and 69% emergency plans. The absence of this preparation is the loss of life and property, which prevents people from economic development of people who prone to disasters.
The lack of planning is not only threatening infrastructure. This threatens life and perpetuates the period of economic insecurity. Good news? The data also points to those who work.
We saw that the same benchmark, employees, local communities, vulnerable groups, sensitive groups, sensitive groups, active partnerships, as sensitive groups, and have been actively affected by vocational health and gender equality.
Now we need wisdom and understanding of “sustainability data”, and how does it connect with the development of our society. We need to know what to say – why some companies are leading and why they are behind. The information is very important to determine the solution of these pain points.
As the company’s advancement in ESG is entering a more controversial stage, it is time to revive the conversation. Companies must stop treating the sustainability until the end and be treated as a means for inclusive, fair development.
This is a strategic, for companies for companies that result in investors and SDGS’s promise.
If we want a continuous future, we must make sure that future people can develop.
